Trusted by the judiciary, government lawyers, prosecutors, and many leading counsel. Click here to request a subscription.
Trusted by the judiciary, government lawyers, prosecutors, and many leading counsel.
Click here to request a subscription.
Trusted by the judiciary, government lawyers, prosecutors, and many leading counsel. Click here to request a subscription.
|
or click here to request site subscription to search and view all judgments |
The Court of Appeal has dismissed an appeal against the severity of a 9-year sentence, with the final 12 months suspended, for a man convicted of manslaughter following a brutal and premeditated assault. The appellant had argued that the sentence did not adequately account for mitigating factors and was disproportionate, especially considering the absence of a weapon and the fact that the unlawful acts would not normally result in death. However, the Court found multiple aggravating factors, including significant premeditation and callousness, justified the sentence within the "higher culpability" range. The Court also noted the disparity in sentences between the appellant and his co-accused brother, who was involved in only one of the two incidents, did not give rise to concerns about proportionality.
manslaughter, Court of Appeal, sentence severity, premeditation, mitigating factors, aggravating factors, assault, culpability, proportionality, suspended sentence, appeal dismissed, People (DPP) v. Mahon, assault causing serious harm, disparity of sentences.
Note: This is intended to be a fair and accurate report of a decision made public by a court of law. Any errors should be notified to the editor and will be dealt with accordingly.
Trusted by the judiciary, government lawyers, prosecutors, and many leading counsel.
Click here to request a subscription.