Trusted by the judiciary, government lawyers, prosecutors, and many leading counsel. Click here to request a subscription.
Trusted by the judiciary, government lawyers, prosecutors, and many leading counsel.
Click here to request a subscription.
Orders refused in residential property ownership dispute and defendants’ ownership upheld
|
or click here to request site subscription to search and view all judgments |
High Court refuses all orders sought by the plaintiff in a property ownership dispute, affirming the legal ownership of the property by the Defendants as previously determined by the High Court and Court of Appeal. The plaintiff's attempts to reanimate proceedings after a conclusive Supreme Court determination were rejected, with the court striking out the proceedings against the Defendants as bound to fail. The court also declined to issue an "Isaac Wunder Order" to restrict the plaintiff from bringing further proceedings.
Residential property dispute - Ownership and title - High Court decision - Court of Appeal affirmation - Supreme Court determination - Tarbutus Defendants - Plaintiff's motion refused - Proceedings struck out - Isaac Wunder Order - Doctrine of res judicata - Injunction against trespass - Rectification of the register - Vexatious litigation - Order 19, Rule 28 (RSC) - Final and binding decision
Note: This is intended to be a fair and accurate report of a decision made public by a court of law. Any errors should be notified to the editor and will be dealt with accordingly.
