Provisional liquidator failed to discharge onus to establish the level of fees and to particularise his claims

Applicant had been appointed as liquidator before being replaced – seeks renumeration for work carried out as provisional liquidator – opposed in that respondent and notice party claim he is seeking an excessive amount - onus on liquidator to discharge proof of level of claim sought as well as keep full particulars and records and to act in commercial sense – report improperly particularised in terms of work done – alternative fee review provided by respondent persuasive – concerns raised about commercial prudence – work done to have applicant appointed as processor cannot be feed for as it was in his own interest – lack of clarity regarding position and renumeration of some consultants – concern raised regarding separate secretarial support – not entitled to legal costs of previous application– renumeration set at level sought by respondent and notice party