Trusted by the judiciary, government lawyers, prosecutors, and many leading counsel. Click here to request a subscription.
Trusted by the judiciary, government lawyers, prosecutors, and many leading counsel.
Click here to request a subscription.
Trusted by the judiciary, government lawyers, prosecutors, and many leading counsel. Click here to request a subscription.
|
or click here to request site subscription to search and view all judgments |
High Court, in a bank's claims for summary judgment: (1) in the first set of proceedings, grants judgment against the first defendant but remits to plenary hearing the claim against the second defendant, in circumstances where “a serious risk of injustice would arise” if judgment was granted; and (2) in the second set of proceedings, grants judgment against both defendants where it was clear there was no real or bona fide defence has been established.
Summary Judgement – banking law – whether a fair or reasonable probability of having a real or bona fide defence, or whether what the defendant said is credible - practice and procedure.
Note: This is intended to be a fair and accurate report of a decision made public by a court of law. Any errors should be notified to the editor and will be dealt with accordingly.
Trusted by the judiciary, government lawyers, prosecutors, and many leading counsel.
Click here to request a subscription.